South Carolina Court Records
The South Carolina court system can be quite confusing. However, since court records contain vital information for genealogical research, it’s important for researchers to fully understand the court systems and take full advantage of the records that they have to offer. Here is a quick description of the court system in South Carolina:
Grand Council or His Majesty’s Council: South Carolina had a centralized system of government, when it was under the British Crown. During that time, Charleston handled all civil administration duties. The Grand Council, which was headed by a governor and made up of various councilors, served as all of the following court officials: General Court, Court of Chancery (Equity), Court of Common Pleas, Court of General Sessions (Assize), Court of Admiralty, Court of Probate, Court of Appeals
Several of those courts received their own judges during a restructuring process that took place in the 1700s. All of those court records were originally created in the city of Charleston and were maintained there for quite a while. Those records that still exist can now be found at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History
General Court: Any cases that did not fall under the jurisdiction of a specific court were handled by the General Court. For example, headright grant petitions were heard by the General Court. His Majesty’s Council Journals (1721-74) and Journals of the Grand Council (1671-92) each contain General Court records. Many of the original records can also be found at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History.
Court of Chancery: The Court of Chancery was created in 1721 in order to handle equity cases. Up until 1791, most of those cases were heard in the city of Charleston and the records relating to those cases were also kept in Charleston. Original Court of Chancery records are now held at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History and have been indexed.
Equity Circuit Court (1791-1821): In 1791, Equity Circuit Court replaced the Court of Chancery. Although, it was still known as the “Chancery Court” at certain times. Equity Court handled cases with no clear or specific remedies, such as complicated land divisions, which might involve multiple factors and variables.
Three equity courts were created, in 1791. First, there was the Upper Circuit, which included the Circuit Court districts of Washington and Ninety-Six, as well as the portion of the Pinckney Circuit Court district in Union County and Spartanburg County. Second, there was the Middle Circuit, which included the Circuit Court districts of Orangeburgh, Camden, and Cheraws, as well as the rest of the Pinckney district. Finally, there was the Lower Circuit, which was made up of the Circuit Court districts of Georgetown, Beaufort, and Charleston.
In 1799, the equity courts were divided again. Four districts were created and each one was split in half. That meant that there were 8 district seats in the state. Then, in 1808, the districts were divided again, into 9 districts. Each county/district had its own equity court, as of 1821, except for the district of Cheraws. Then, in 1868, the Court of Ordinary (Probate Court) and the Court of Equity (Chancery Court) were combined, creating the Court of Probate.
Brent Howard Holcomb, “South Carolina Equity Records,” The South Carolina Magazine of Ancestral Research 6 (1978): 235-38 holds maps featuring equity circuits. Understanding the layout of those circuits is essential for genealogical research to be successful.
Known records are located in the following places:
- Camden Circuit (1808-21) and Middle Circuit (1791-99) records are located in Camden County
- Charleston Circuit (1808-21) and Lower Circuit (1791-99) records are located in Charleston County
- Columbia Circuit (1808-21) records are located in Richland County
- Pinckney Circuit (1808-21) and Western Circuit (1799-1808) records are located in Union County
The Upper Circuit records for 1791 to 1799 have not been located. Nor have the records for the Eastern, Northern, Southern, or lower half of the Western circuits for 1799 to 1808. The records for the circuits of Orangeburgh, Ninety-Six, Cheraws, Georgetown, and Washington for 1808 to 1821 are also missing.
Court of Common Pleas: The Court of Common Pleas is South Carolina’s version of the civil court. It is responsible for handling any cases in which private organizations or citizens file claims against each other. For most of colonial times, Court of Common Pleas cases were handled by the Grand Council. The Court of Common Pleas was located in Charleston until 1772. However, at about that time, Courts of Common Please were created in all of the circuit court districts in the state. Although, up until 1785, the records for each of those courts were still maintained in the city of Charleston.
Even though every county was given a Court of Common Pleas as of 1785, the courts in the Orangeburgh District counties only functioned until 1800 and the courts in the counties of Georgetown, Charleston, and Beaufort never functioned at all. The Court of Common Please operated on a district level and a county level between 1785 and 1800. So, it’s important for researchers to examine both types of records. In 1800, districts (counties) were created and a Court of Common Pleas was assigned to each one.
Court of Common Pleas records may include any of the following items: Guardianship Records, Petitions, Orders, Reports, Dower Renunciations, War Pension Applications.
All of those records and more can be found in the office of the court clerk. Most of the records from prior to 1865 can be obtained through the FHL or the South Carolina Department of Archives and History and have been placed on microfilm.
Court of General Sessions of the Peace, Oyer and Terminer, Assize and General Gaol Delivery: Generally known as the Court of Assize or the Court of General Sessions, this is the court responsible for trying criminal cases in the state of South Carolina. During colonial times, for the most part, those functions were performed by the Grand Council. Charleston was the home of the Court of General Sessions until 1772. By that point, each circuit court district was given its own Court of General Sessions, but Charleston held those records until 1785. The Courts of Common Pleas and Courts of General Sessions were each run in similar ways, with the Orangeburgh District county court only functioning until around 1791 and those in Georgetown, Charleston, and Beaufort not functioning at all. Both county and district records must be examined during genealogical research.
Court of Ordinary: In colonial times, South Carolina was a province. It had a governor, who acted as ordinary for the province. The governor held both administration power and probate power. From 1692 onward, the Secretary of the Colony also began acting as ordinary. Circuit court districts were given Courts of Ordinary in 1781. In 1787, functioning counties in each district also received Courts of Ordinary. In 1800, districts, or counties, were formed, and each one was given a Court of Ordinary. The Court of Equity and the Court of Ordinary merged and became the Court of Probate in 1868.
Circuit Courts (1769-1800): In 1769, the South Carolina Assembly created Circuit Courts. Every circuit court district was given a Clerk of the Crown and a Clerk of Common Pleas for its Court of General Sessions and Court of Common Pleas, respectively. Circuit Court records were kept, until 1785, in Charleston. All records were transferred to the district, or county, where the district seat for the Circuit Court was, as of 1800, which was when the Circuit Court system ceased to exist.
Precinct Courts: Precinct Courts were created in 1721, and they were also known as County Courts. There were 5 of them outside the city of Charleston. Minor civil suits and minor criminal cases were tried in those courts by justices of the peace. The South Carolina Department of Archives and History states that no records for the Precinct Court system still exist today.
County Courts: In 1785, a new system of County Courts was established. They were each required to record renunciations of dower, conveyances, levy taxes, and tavern-keepers licenses. Some County Courts functioned from 1785 until 1791, while others didn’t function at all until 1800. County Courts became the primary judicial bodies, when districts (counties) were established, which was in 1800. County Courts of the time had three offices. They were the Court of Common Pleas, the Court of General Sessions, and the Register of Mesne Conveyance.
The FHL and the Charleston Department of Archives & History each have microfilmed copies of the following court records on file: County Court, Court of Common Pleas, Equity Court, District Court, Court of General Sessions, Probate Court, Court of Magistrates and Freeholders. See Also Guide to U.S. Court Records Research
South Carolina Land Records
Many research holes can be filled using court, property, or land records. Luckily, South Carolina has one of the most complete collections of colonial land records of any of the original 13 colonies. All of the land records were kept in Charleston, which survived the Revolutionary War, allowing the records to survive as well.
Bounties and headrights were responsible for creating land distribution in the state. Each “head” that settled in the area was entitled to free land. All males and females under 16 who arrived with the first fleet were given a 100-acre headright, while males over 16 were given a 150-acre headright. Land for servants and slaves could be claimed by the leader of each household as well. Those who arrived anytime before 1756, but after the first fleet, were given 50 acres per household member. Anyone arriving in or after 1756 could claim 100 acres if they were the head-of-household and claim an extra 50 acres for each other person who was living in their household at the time.
Anyone who wanted to take advantage of headrights (grantees) had to get a warrant by petitioning to the Grand Council. The head-of-household had to make that petition in person by listing where the land was located, how many acres he wanted to claim and, of course, his name. Each household could only claim land for its members, but there was no major requirement for claiming that land besides that. Petitions can often be genealogically useful because they contain names and ages of children and spouses. Each petition was dated and that date is known as the pursuant, warrant, or precept date.
The South Carolina Department of Archives and History has the petitions for land on file. Some are collected in the 27 volumes of Records of His Majesty’s Council, which covers all of colonial times. Others can be found in the two-volume collection called Records of the Grand Council (1671-92). Although none of those 29 volumes is indexed, they are all organized chronologically, which means that the date must be known in order to find the appropriate record.
Once the warrant was in hand, the grantee had to have the land surveyed. The surveyor would have to draw a map (plat) of the land, indicating where the boundaries of the land were. Plats contain a lot of useful genealogical information, including the recording date, precept date, the location of the land, and a description of the land. The Combined Alphabetical Index holds an index of recorded plats.
Completed plats were to be brought back to the surveyor general’s office. There, they were checked to ensure that nobody else was claiming the same piece of land already. If there were no other claims to the land, grant papers were drawn up and sent to the governor, who would stamp his official seal and sign the documents. South Carolina land plat covering 1731 to 1861 are on file with the FHL and the years of 1688 to 1872 have also been indexed. They are on 28 reels of microfilm and were obtained in 1955 from the Secretary of State’s Office’s original records.
Land owners who obtained grants then had to pay quitrent payments on the land. The first was to be made within 10 years on bounty land or 2 years on headright land. The quitrent originated as an English land tax that was meant to cover “the land obligations due the manor,” which might include haying or plowing the lord’s land. Each of those costs were computed and a payment was made once per year, and then the obligations were “quit” until the following year. Many land grants have been placed on microfilm from the original records. There are some indexed volumes, as well as a partial general index. All of that information for 1784 to 1882 is available through the FHL.
South Carolina memorial records are also important land records for genealogists. They were created between 1731 and 1775. Anyone who obtained land during that time was required to create a memorial, which listed land boundaries, names of adjacent landowners, amount of land, and the location of the land. Memorials could also show a title chain, which often started with the original landowner. The South Carolina Department of Archives and History holds original memorials and the Combined Alphabetical Index holds an index of those memorials.
In 1772, a North Carolina and South Carolina border survey took place for the first time. However, it wasn’t until 1815 that the border was officially agreed upon. At that time, some land that was initially thought to be in North Carolina wound up being considered part of South Carolina. That land was initially located in Tryon County and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Therefore the areas that are now known as York, Spartanburg, Cherokee, and Greenville County may have records on file in both states.
South Carolina deeds are known as conveyances, or sometimes as mesne conveyances. The Register of Mesne Conveyance’s office was given each deed that was recorded. These days, those records can be found in the office of the Clerk of the Court for each county. Most of the records that predate 1865 have also been placed on microfilm and can be obtained through the FHL or the South Carolina Department of Archives and History. See Also Guide to U.S. Land Records Research
- Colonial Plats (onlinearchives.sc.gov)
- Warrants for Land in South Carolina, 1692-1711
- Warrants for Land in South Carolina, 1680-1692
- Warrants for Land in South Carolina, 1672-1679
- North Carolina Land Grants in South Carolina
- BLM Land Records (glorecords.blm.gov)
- South Carolina Land Record Books (amazon.com)
- See also Alexander S. Salley Jr., and R. N. Olsberg, eds., Warrants for Land in South Carolina, 1672–1721 (Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1977)
- Alexander S. Salley, Jr., Records of the Secretary of the Province and the Register of the Province of South Carolina, 1671–1675 (Columbia, S.C.: Historical Commission of South Carolina, 1944).
- Esker, Katie-Prince Ward. South Carolina Memorials, 1731–1776: Abstracts of Selected Land Records from a Collection in the Department of Archives and History. 2 vols. New Orleans: Polyanthos, 1973–77.
- Jackson, Ronald Vern, Gary Ronald Teeples, and David Schaefermeyer, eds., Index to South Carolina Land Grants, 1784–1800. Bountiful, Utah: Accelerated Indexing Systems, 1977.
- Langley, Clara A. South Carolina Deed Abstracts, 1719–1772. 4 vols. Easley, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1983–84.
- Lucas, Silas E., Jr., An Index to Deed of the Province and State of South Carolina, 1719–1785, and Charleston District, 1785–1800. Easley, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1977.
- See Brent Howard Holcomb, comp., North Carolina Land Grants in South Carolina (Greenville, S.C.: A Press, 1980).
South Carolina Probate Records
In South Carolina, any land owned by a father passed to the eldest son when the father died without having a will (intestate). That law was known as the law of primogeniture. On the other hand, when there was a will, the heirs were determined by the contents of that document. If a landowner died intestate and had no sons, the daughters each gained equal shares of the property in question. On May 1, 1791, a law was passed that got rid of primogeniture. The exact wording of the new law was as follows:
“If the intestate shall leave a widow and one or more children, the widow shall take one-third of the said estate, and the remainder shall be divided between the children, if more than one, but if only one, the remainder shall be vested in that one forever.”
In colonial times, estates were distributed according to an English statute, which was put into place in 1670. That statute distributed a third of the land to the widow, if there was one. The eldest son, who was known as the heir-at-law, received all of the land aside from that and received the widow’s share of the land when she died. A third of the landowners personal property was also to be given to his widow, while any heirs split the remaining two-thirds equally between them. In cases where a landowner died and left no children, his widow received half of his estate and his siblings received the other half, equally divided amongst them. Any property not mentioned in a will was divided based on the laws at the time.
The original court of ordinary (probate court) was the Grand Council, headed by the governor. As of 1692, the secretary of the province also started performing court of ordinary functions.
Each of the 7 court districts was assigned a court of ordinary, in 1781. However, only the records for the following districts still exist: Camden,
Counties were formed from circuit court districts, in 1785. Two years later, courts of ordinary were established in those counties. Circuit court district counties existed for a period of 15 years. In that time, the courts of ordinary in the circuit court district and in the county could hear cases involving probate actions. In 1800, 25 districts (counties) were formed from the existing districts and counties. Each of those districts was given its own court of ordinary. The county judge of probate’s office holds the records for circuit and county courts from 1785 to 1800, as well as probate records from 1800 onward.
The equity court records contain many probate records. Equity courts were first started in 1791. By 1821, most of them no longer existed. Equity courts were responsible for several probate actions, including divisions of property.
The various branches of the FHL and the Department of Archives and History, which is located in Charleston, each hold probate document records, many of which are available on microfilm.
Wills, administrations, guardianships, inventories, appraisals, and settlements are some of the records related to a person’s estate or probate record. Probate records can be an excellent source of genealogical information. Probate records are created at the time of an individual’s death, and are meant to establish the legality of a will. In probate records, you can find the will, which will tell you what types of assets the deceased had. They also often list the names of survivors, and their relationship to the deceased. See Also Guide to U.S. Probate Records Research
- Will Transcripts, 1782-1855 (onlinearchives.sc.gov)
- Indexes to the County Wills of South Carolina
- South Carolina, Probate Records, Bound Volumes, 1671-1977
- South Carolina, Probate Records, Files and Loose Papers, 1732-1964
- Caroline T. Moore and Agatha Aimar Simmons, Abstracts of the Wills of State of South Carolina, 1670– 1800, 4 vols. (Columbia, S.C.: R. L. Bryan, 1960–74)
- Caroline T. Moore, comp., Records of the Secretary of the Province of South Carolina, 1692–1721 (Columbia, S.C.: R. L. Bryan, 1978);
- Brent Howard Holcomb, comp., Probate Records of South Carolina, 3 vols. (Easley, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1977)
- Alexander S. Salley, Jr., “Abstracts from the Records, Court of Ordinary (Probate),” in South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine, 8–13 (1907–12).
- Brent Howard Holcomb and Elmer O. Parker, comps., Old Camden District Wills and Administrations, 1781–1787 (Easley, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1981)
- Brent Howard Holcomb, comps., Ninety-Six District Journal of the Court of Ordinary, Inventory Book, Will Book, 1781–1786 (Easley, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1978)
- Pauline Young, comp., Abstracts of Old Ninety-Six and Abbeville District: Wills, Bonds, Administrations, 1774–1860 (1950; reprint, Easley, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1977).
- Martha Lou Houston, comp., Indexes to the County Wills of South Carolina (1939; reprint, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 2003); and Charleston Free Library, Index to the Wills of Charleston County, South Carolina, 1671–1868 (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1993)
- Pauline Young, comp., A Genealogical Collection of South Carolina Wills and Records, 2 vols. (1955; reprint, Easley, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1984).
- Brent Howard Holcomb, “South Carolina Equity Records,” The South Carolina Magazine of Ancestral Research, 6 (1978): 235-38.
- South Carolina Probate Record Books (amazon.com)
South Carolina Tax Records
One tax list from 1733 is still extant, as are a few random tax collectors. However, most South Carolina tax records no longer exist. Up until 1800, the tax districts were defined by the townships and parishes. Circuit Court districts and the counties within those districts were also considered tax districts. That lasted from 1785 until 1800. The following are extant tax lists covering the years of 1783 to 1799:
- Christ Church Parish (1784, 1786, 1788, 1793-99)
- Prince Frederick’s Parish (1784, 1786)
- Prince George’s Parish (1786-87)
- Prince William’s Parish (1798)
- St. Andrew’s Parish (1784-85, 1787, 1789, 1791, 1795)
- St. Bartholomew’s Parish (1783-87, 1798)
- St. Helena’s Parish (1798)
- St. James Goose Creek (1796)
- St. John’s Berkeley Parish (1793)
- St. Luke’s Parish (1798-99)
- St. Paul’s Parish (1783, 1785-96, 1798-99)
- Ninety-Six District (1787)
- Orangeburgh District (1787)
- Lancaster County in Camden District (1797)
- Lexington County in Orangeburgh District (1788)
Although those tax lists still exist, several of them do not contain all of the original information. The South Carolina Department of Archives and History has each of those tax lists on file.
The majority of the counties/districts have some extant tax records on file from 1865 onward. Some of them have records dating back to 1800. The South Carolina Department of Archives and History has a nearly complete 1824 series on file and indexed. That series mostly focuses on the districts in the Low Country. Also on file at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History are original copies of most tax lists that still exist for the state. Several county tax records have also been microfilmed and are available there, as well as through the FHL.
Jury lists can sometimes be good genealogical substitutes for missing tax lists. Those jury lists were originally created using tax lists and they listed any men that were eligible to serve as jury members.
Tax record information can also be somewhat extrapolated from voter registration lists for the years of 1867, 1868, and 1898. Since slaves were freed at the time, the 1867 and 1868 voter registration lists can be especially useful for pinpointing information about African American ancestors. Each county kept copies of the voter records, but they can also be found at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History.
There are existing directories for Charleston that begin in 1782. Ancestors living in Charleston may be traceable through those records. The Charleston Library Society has those directories on file. See Also Guide to U.S. Tax Records Research
- Mary Bondurant Warren, comp., South Carolina Jury Lists, 1718–1783 (Danielsville, Ga.: Heritage Papers, 1977).
- Ge Lee Corley Hendrix and Morn McKoy Lindsay, comps., The Jury Lists of South Carolina, 1778–1779 (1975; reprint, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1980) is accepted as proof of the identity of Revolutionary War patriots.
- South Carolina Tax Record Books (amazon.com)